Investing in poor children saves lives, and money

Pregnant women and mothers in the remote village of Ali-Beig, Bamyan province central Afghanistan, attend consultations with a mobile health team that visits them once a month. (Credit: UNICEF/Karimi)

The total number of children that die of preventable causes worldwide continues to decline, says the United Nations children’s agency, but such progress disguises a still-massive and intolerable death toll.

At the current pace of progress, UNICEF has estimated, some 70 million children will die before turning 5 years old by 2030 from easily preventable causes.

UNICEF today released a study that, as usual, calls for a renewed push to cut child deaths and asks for more money. But what what the report also emphasizes is that even without increased funds investing in life-saving solutions that target the world’s poorest children can both save lives and money.

Currently, and perhaps surprisingly to some, more foreign aid dollars go to middle-income countries than low-income ones. Part of the reason for this is that recipient countries like India, China and Nigeria have relatively prosperous (if not at always well distributed) economies with large populations of people living in poverty.

But there’s also no escaping that some aid dollars are not reaching the neediest countries, according to experts at the Overseas Development Institute and Center for Global Development.

The UNICEF report calls for improving how aid is targeted to maximize impact. UNICEF estimates that the number of lives saved nearly doubles when aid projects and funding targets the most vulnerable children.

“The evidence is compelling: Investing in the poorest children is not only right in principle, it is also right in practice – saving more lives for every dollar spent,”  UNICEF head Anthony Lake said in a statement.

RELATED  Bangladesh's new loophole in child marriage law is 'devastating,' rights groups say

“Investing equitably in children’s health also saves futures and helps break intergenerational cycles of poverty. A healthy child has a better chance of learning more in school and earning more as an adult.”

UNICEF looked at data from 51 countries that represent more than 80 percent of under-five deaths to determine future trends and opportunities for reducing deaths. It analyzed access to 6 key health interventions such as vaccinations, births delivered by skilled attendants and access to medicine for pneumonia

The good news is that overall access to the key areas improved between 2010 and 2015. More important, the coverage gaps between poor and non-poor groups shrank over the same period. UNICEF then compared what would happen if $1 million went to support poor or non-poor people. Nearly 85 percent of the 1.1 million lives saved across the 51 countries in 2015 were from poor families.

The biggest opportunity for impact is by helping people at the bottom. An estimated 166 deaths are averted for every $1 million spent targeting poor groups and 92 deaths are averted by spending the money on non-poor groups. Better targeting of money can help improve health equity and save more lives.

“We can make faster, more cost-effective progress in reducing the number of children who die unnecessarily, year after year, by investing in the scale-up of equity-enhancing policies and programs,” the report says.

“And we must. Because the lives of tens of millions of children depend on it.”

RELATED  Myanmar gingerly receives Malaysian aid for Rohingya

The messaging from the report appears to target donor countries, especially ones where foreign aid budgets are under consideration for cuts. Lake speaks directly to governments in his statement appealing to countries trying to make “every dollar count.” The report’s recommendations similarly discuss the kinds of things that can be supported at the donor level.

Namely, it encourages investments in immunization, nutrition, and other health programs that protect vulnerable children. There is also a need for better data to identify and target the poorest families. Programs that achieve these things have the best opportunity for success.

Health Surveillance Assistant (HSA) Noah Chipeta (left) prepares to prick the finger of three-year-old Trinity Banda (front right) to test for malaria at the Chanthuntha community clinic in rural Kasungu District, Malawi, May 2017. (Credit: UNICEF)

The report includes examples of success stories to show the various ways it can be done. Bangladesh cut its child mortality rate by nearly 74 percent from 1990 to 2015 due in part to its expansion of community clinics at the village level. The clinics provide routine services that address the major causes of child mortality in the country – birth complications, pneumonia and diarrhea – free of charge.

The country also worked to improve sanitation, cutting open defecation from 42 percent in 2003 to 1 percent by 2015. Equity-based health programs that targeted the poor helped prevent deaths in Bangladesh and improve overall access to health services.

“This evidence comes at a critical time – especially as the value of money for global aid is increasingly being brought into question and evidence for impact demanded,” the report concludes.

“The stakes are very high – as is the cost of inaction.”

Share.

About Author

Tom Murphy

Tom Murphy is a New Hampshire-based reporter for Humanosphere. Before joining Humanosphere, Tom founded and edited the aid blog A View From the Cave. His work has appeared in Foreign Policy, the Huffington Post, the Guardian, GlobalPost and Christian Science Monitor. He tweets at @viewfromthecave. Contact him at tmurphy[at]humanosphere.org.