AP

RECENT POSTS

Cholera Concerns Mounting in Sierra Leone | 

A cholera outbreak in Sierra Leone that made its way to the capital city of Freetown is spreading at an alarming rate. MSF reported an estimated 1,500 cases and 17 deaths in a July 31 press release. The WHO released new numbers yesterday that cholera has infected 5,706 people since the start of August. They single out Western Aread and Tonkolili as areas with the greatest burden.

Right now, the response is being led by major players such as the Sierra Leonean Ministry of Health, MSF, UNICEF and the WHO.  At the same time, neighboring Guinea is dealing with its own cholera outbreak.  According to MSF, the shared resivor  near the coast is a ‘breeding ground for the disease.’

“This ‘coastal cholera’ has already killed some 250 people,” says MSF epidemiologist Michel Van Herp. “The water reservoir allows the Vibrio cholerae bacteria to survive and go on to infect the population.” To respond, organizations are turning their focus onto improving hygiene.

Continue reading

Catching Up on Cholera in Haiti | 

When cholera broke out in Haiti in October 2010, reporter Jonathan Katz* was the first to break the story connecting UN peacekeepers from Nepal to the outbreak. Nearly two years later, Haiti is still struggling to address the issue of cholera and the UN has yet to admit that it was to blame for the outbreak.

I caught up with Jonathan to discuss his original reporting, the outbreak and the UN’s response. Continue reading

Battle of perception between Global Fund and AP continues | 

I can’t quite tell what’s going on here, so I will merely report the two polar opposite viewpoints.

The Associated Press is reporting in an “exclusive” (which so far has seemed to indicate a perspective on this story shared by few others) that the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria is considering not telling us anymore when it discovers bad things happening.

As you can read here and here, the Global Fund has repeatedly been accused of incompetence or malfeasance by the AP, based on anonymous sources, on a number of occasions — apparently, after the Global Fund itself identified the fraud or theft and began investigating these problems.

Now, according to the AP:

A global health fund championed by celebrities and world leaders is considering scaling back its groundbreaking philosophy of full transparency about how it spends billions of dollars in health care in poor countries.

But according to the Global Fund, it has no such intentions and remains committed to making public all of its problems based on its a policy of “full transparency and zero tolerance of corruption.” From a recent press release:

“By nature of its mandate, and in order to reach some of the world’s most vulnerable populations, the Global Fund works in countries with weak institutional and control environments. In tackling mismanagement and corruption, it is driven by two core principles – full transparency and zero tolerance of fraud,” said the Board’s outgoing chairman, Tedros Ghebreyesus on the eve of the meeting.

This is all very odd, since usually the difference between a media report of wrongdoing and the organization’s response differ just by matter of degree and nuance.

These two are just saying completely different things.

What’s different in this latest AP report is they are attributing the allegations to a person this time, the fund’s Inspector General John Parsons. This is at least more credible than simply attributing the accusations to unknown persons and documents.

We’ll just have to wait and see as the investigation proceeds. The Global Fund board did decide, by the way, to continue their policy to report publicly its losses due to theft or fraud.