industry

RECENT POSTS

UN health summit makes food, beverage and drug industries nervous | 

Flickr, Roadsidepictures

Members of the United Nations General Assembly met this week to come up with a plan to combat chronic disease in poor countries that appears to have some in the food, beverage and drug industries worried.

Ten years ago, a similar meeting here produced a massive global response to the AIDS pandemic, most notably with the creation of the Global Fund for Fighting AIDS, TB and Malaria (which yesterday, despite clearly saving many millions of lives, got slammed for not working as well as advertised).

The expectation at the UN meeting is that delegates will decide that somebody should do something … and would like to be more specific, but then say they are late for another meeting, grab their hats and coats and make for the door.

Part of the problem is that many chronic diseases are “lifestyle” diseases — lifestyles that a lot of corporations want us to buy into.

The need for action is clear: Chronic or non-communicable diseases (aka NCDs) are the world’s big killers, representing about 60 percent of all causes of death. Cancer, heart disease, stroke, lung disease (mostly from tobacco), diabetes and the like kill many more people — most of them in the developing world — than do infectious diseases like AIDS, TB or malaria.

But governments, donors, the drug industry and health agencies don’t set their global health priorities simply on the basis of the burden of disease, as reasonable as that might sound. Some diseases are too complex, their treatment too expensive, to feasibly act against in poor countries.

Many of the NCDs are, however, easily and cheaply treated or prevented. High blood pressure can be treated with drugs costing pennies per day. Tackling some of the biggest killers, the World Health Organization says, can be done at a cost of about $1.20 per day.

Simply educating people about a healthy diet and the risks of tobacco or excessive alcohol use could do a lot.

It all sounds do-able, this aim to shift the global health agenda to include these non-contagious killers. So why the pessimism about getting a meaningful game plan out of this UN meeting?

Part of the problem is the concerns of industry. These health goals sometimes run up against powerful commercial interests in the food, beverage and pharmaceutical industries.

UN

UN Secretary General Ban ki-Moon

“There is a well-documented and shameful history of certain players in industry who ignored the science, sometimes even their own research, and put public health at risk to protect their own profits,” UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said Monday in a speech on the NCDs.

Ban cited the tobacco and alcohol industries, but also makers of processed foods high in salt, sugar and fat — and the media companies that advertise unhealthy products. Continue reading

International trade map: Washington state still big on airplanes | 

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has provided a interactive graphic that describes state-by-state the impact of international trade.

Washington state’s economy is heavily dependent on international trade, which some say has helped fuel some of our community’s more globalized view of the world. There’s a lot of talk these days about “global health” as a new emerging industry for this region, but as this chart indicates we’re still mostly about building airplanes.

Even Microsoft ranks pretty low, by comparison in terms of jobs and economic impact, after Boeing. Another point of note: Our local do-gooders talk a lot about wanting to assist sub-Saharan Africa. But one of the best ways to help Africa is going to be through economic development and commercial partnerships.

As this chart shows, we could do a lot more to expand our business ties with Africa.

Go to link above. This is just a screen grab:

U.S. Chamber of Commerce

NPR: Seattle’s global health industry | 

Flickr, by striatic

My colleague Keith Seinfeld did a story for NPR today on our local boom in the global health industry that you can listen to at this link entitled “Seattle Benefits from Growth in Global Health.”

Industry?

I always twinge a little when I hear people talk about global health as an industry. It is, in the sense that people work in it, get paid to do it and sometimes make things they hope to give or even sell to people in the developing world. But the word bugs me.

The story was introduced on NPR as a bright spot in the down economy: “In Seattle, at least one industry is booming.” The story includes a nice profile of Ken Stuart, founder of Seattle Biomed, and tells of his perseverance working for decades on a shoestring budget (even in a garage) on neglected tropical diseases — until the Gates Foundation stepped in to give him truckloads of money. The story also includes Gov. Christine Gregoire celebrating global health as a great new economic engine for our region.

The Governor isn’t alone in talking about global health mostly as a jobs program. There seems to be some kind of public forum or conference every few weeks based on this notion. Continue reading